Talk:Weighted positional method: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4:
:By "sequential" I mean that it eliminates one candidate at a time. Nanson eliminates every candidate with a below-average Borda score, and so may take more than one at once. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 15:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
The Borda count is the only weighted positional method that never ranks the Condorcet winner last.
Since Nanson and Baldwin pass Smith, can we rephrase this as "never ranks every member of the Smith set last"? [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 07:20, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
| |||