Techniques of method design: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
* '''Banks set''' = ''set of candidates which are top on some maximal sub-chain of the defeat graph.'' Not monotonic as a set. |
* '''Banks set''' = ''set of candidates which are top on some maximal sub-chain of the defeat graph.'' Not monotonic as a set. |
||
* Dutta's '''Minimal covering set''' = ''smallest non-empty set such that when any other candidate is added, that candidate is covered in the resulting set. |
* Dutta's '''Minimal covering set''' = ''smallest non-empty set such that when any other candidate is added, that candidate is covered in the resulting set. |
||
* '''Bipartisan set''' = ''set of candidates getting non-zero probability in the bipartisan distribution.'' |
* '''Bipartisan set''' = ''set of candidates getting non-zero probability in the [[bipartisan distribution]].'' |
||
* Forest Simmons' set '''P''' = ''set of candidates which are not approval-consistently defeated.'' This set is totally ordered by the defeats and contains the most approved candidate and a possible Condorcet winner. |
* Forest Simmons' set '''P''' = ''set of candidates which are not approval-consistently defeated.'' This set is totally ordered by the defeats and contains the most approved candidate and a possible Condorcet winner. |
||