Template:Infobox voting method: Difference between revisions
put new parameters at the top
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (put new parameters at the top) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Infobox
|title={{{title|}}}
| label1 = Condorcet compliant
| data1 = {{#if: {{{condorcet|}}}
| Yes [[Category:Condorcet_methods]]▼
| {{#ifexpr: {{{condorcet|}}}
| No▼
<noinclude>▼
| }}
| label2 = Mutual majority compliant
| data2 = {{#if: {{{mutual-majority|}}}
| {{#ifexpr: {{{mutual-majority|}}}
| Yes
| No
| }}
| label3 = Favorite betrayal compliant
| data3 = {{#if: {{{favorite-betrayal|}}}
| {{#ifexpr: {{{favorite-betrayal|}}}
| No [[Category:Fails favorite betrayal criterion]]
}}
| }}
▲}}<noinclude>
<templatedata>
{
Line 12 ⟶ 31:
"Majority criterion": {
"description": "Does a candidate that a majority of voters prefer over all others always win?",
"type": "boolean"▼
▲ },
"Mutual majority criterion": {▼
"description": "Does someone from a set of candidates that a majority of voters prefer over all others always win?",▼
"example": "If a majority of voters are split between several flavors of chocolate ice cream, but agree that any flavor of chocolate is better than any other flavor, then one of the chocolate-type flavors must win.",▼
"type": "boolean"
},
Line 33 ⟶ 47:
"Independence of Smith-dominated Alternatives criterion": {
"description": "Does the same candidate always win when candidates not in the Smith set are added or removed from the election?",
"type": "boolean"▼
▲ },
"Favorite Betrayal criterion": {▼
"description": "Do voters ever have strategic incentive to indicate they prefer someone who isn't their honest favorite more than their honest favorite?",▼
"type": "boolean"
},
Line 51 ⟶ 61:
"label": "Condorcet criterion",
"description": "Does the Condorcet winner always win when they exist?",
▲ "type": "boolean"
},
"title": {
"description": "The name of the voting method",
"required": true
},
"mutual-majority": {
▲ "description": "Does someone from a set of candidates that a majority of voters prefer over all others always win?",
▲ "example": "If a majority of voters are split between several flavors of chocolate ice cream, but agree that any flavor of chocolate is better than any other flavor, then one of the chocolate-type flavors must win.",
▲ "type": "boolean"
},
"favorite-betrayal": {
▲ "description": "Do voters ever have strategic incentive to indicate they prefer someone who isn't their honest favorite more than their honest favorite?",
"type": "boolean"
}
Line 56 ⟶ 81:
"description": "An infobox for voting methods",
"paramOrder": [
"title",
"condorcet",▼
"favorite-betrayal",
"Utility criterion",
"Majority criterion",
▲ "Mutual majority criterion",
▲ "condorcet",
"Smith criterion",
"Independence of Smith-dominated Alternatives criterion",
"Later-no-harm criterion",
▲ "Favorite Betrayal criterion",
"Single-winner reduction",
"Party list case"
| |||