User:Psephomancy/2D election simulation examples: Difference between revisions
User:Psephomancy/2D election simulation examples (view source)
Revision as of 17:59, 5 December 2019
, 4 years ago→IRV: add exhaustive ballot and contingent vote
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→Score: clarify color scheme) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→IRV: add exhaustive ballot and contingent vote) |
||
Line 21:
}}
== IRV ("RCV") / Exhaustive Ballot ==
A wins under [[Instant-runoff voting|Instant-Runoff Voting]] ("Ranked-Choice Voting"), after B is eliminated for not having enough first-preference votes, leaving A and C. (A is slightly closer to the center, so more people in the center support A over C.)
Line 47:
|colors=#1f77b4, #ff7f0e, #2ca02c
}}
[[W:Exhaustive ballot|Exhaustive ballot]] behaves the same way, since it uses the same elimination rule as IRV, only held using multiple single-mark ballot runoffs instead of using a ranked ballot.
== Top-two runoff / Open primary / Contingent Vote ==
A wins under [[Runoff voting|top-two runoff]] or an [[W:Nonpartisan blanket primary|open primary]]. A and C have the most votes and proceed to the runoff. (None of the candidates gets over 50% in the first round.) A is slightly closer to the center, so more people in the center support A over C in the runoff.
Line 74 ⟶ 75:
|colors=#1f77b4, #ff7f0e, #2ca02c
}}
[[W:Contingent vote|Contingent vote]] behaves the same way, except the runoff election is held automatically based on ranked ballots.
== Score ==
|