User:RodCrosby/QPR2: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→Quasi single-member?: and renamed) |
m (→Addressing lack of candidates: para) |
||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
==Possible additional features== |
==Possible additional features== |
||
===Addressing lack of candidates=== |
===Addressing lack of candidates=== |
||
For all serious parties, maximising their national vote share is imperative under this system. But on occasion, for a variety of reasons, a party may not be able to field a full slate in every constituency, thereby seriously handicapping itself. |
For all serious parties, maximising their national vote share is imperative under this system. But on occasion, for a variety of reasons, a party may not be able to field a full slate in every constituency, thereby seriously handicapping itself. |
||
In such cases, a party-only box could be permitted on the ballot in a candidate-less constituency. While not benefiting the party locally, it would still garner "votes" that would contribute to its national seat-total, helping to elect candidates elsewhere. Of course, the usual rules on lost deposits would apply to such "empty" boxes, to deter national no-hopers from running an "empty" box in every constituency. |
|||
See also the case of the Speaker below. |
See also the case of the Speaker below. |