User:RodCrosby/QPR2: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→Subsequent members elected: electorate) |
m (→Why ranked ballots?: minority) |
||
Line 143: | Line 143: | ||
While not absolutely essential, they would have utility as follows: |
While not absolutely essential, they would have utility as follows: |
||
* in a |
* in a minority of cases where a winning party's candidates ran separately in a constituency, it may be more appropriate to employ a kind of STV to identify the winning candidate instead of the alternative, a kind of SNTV. |
||
* the ranked ballots could be subsequently recounted to compute a nationwide two-party preferred vote, as occurs in Australia. In a UK context that may be of value in the event of a hung parliament. |
* the ranked ballots could be subsequently recounted to compute a nationwide two-party preferred vote, as occurs in Australia. In a UK context that may be of value in the event of a hung parliament. |
||