User talk:Kristomun: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10:
The wiki is 14 years old and has never had a ton of activity, so the goals/policies were never really solidified. Your input is welcome, especially on how to handle the separation of biased advocacy from neutral informative content (which are both welcome). See [[Electowiki:The caucus]] for the discussion topics and [[Electowiki:Policy]]. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 18:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
== [[Condorcet IRV page]] ==
Thank you so much for going through & cleaning that up (removing LNH bits)! I had meant to go do it after our discussion but got sidetracked. Much appreciated! 🙏
--[[User:Marcosb|Marcosb]] ([[User talk:Marcosb|talk]]) 20:56, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
== [[:Category:Consensus multiwinner methods]] ==
Line 42 ⟶ 48:
[[User:Kristomun|Kristofer]], I would support your inclusion on the [[Voting theorists]] page if you would flesh out your user page with your contributions to make them clear. I know much of it has been simulations which may not really count but there is one part you mention I am super interested in. You mention the tradeoff between representativity and utilitarian efficiency of multiwinner methods. Can you make an electowiki page detailing the results? Is it possible to add some of the more modern systems to that analysis like [[Sequentially Spent Score | SSS]], [[Sequential Monroe voting | SMV]] and [[Allocated Score]]? --[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]] ([[User talk:Dr. Edmonds|talk]]) 16:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
🙏
| |||