User talk:Kristomun: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→Category:Consensus multiwinner methods: presumably the same person :)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 28:
::: Centrist multiwinner methods, I'd call majoritarian (although that might not work for Range as it doesn't pass the majority criterion to begin with). A method like [[Minimax approval]] is rather "anti-centrist" - compared to proportional representation, centrist ones favor large blocs and minimax/consensus ones favor small ones.
::: I don't have much sunk into the name, so if you could think of a better one, I wouldn't have a problem changing it. I guess the problem is that it's hard to summarize just what these councils are (nonproportional, but not majoritarian/centrist), so I just went with consensus due to its use when the council uses a consensus/supermajority/unanimity method to vote on issues. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 17:40, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
::: Perhaps, for the lack of a better term, we should just call them minimax multi-winner methods. I'll think more about it. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 10:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
| |||