User talk:Psephomancy: Difference between revisions
→Social movement article: new section
mNo edit summary |
(→Social movement article: new section) |
||
Line 213:
: {{ping|Dr. Edmonds}} Yes, but the wording "movement for government formation" doesn't really work. It's "movement for NPV" or "movement for open primaries", etc. Anyway the link is still there, I just moved it. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 03:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
== Social movement article ==
I think there's some interesting things that could be said about voting theory in the context of social movements. For example, STAR voting was used in (https://www.starvoting.us/bassnectar), and I think one of the reason STAR advocates market precinct-summability is because it allows it to be more "vote-on-the-go" than IRV. There's also https://electowiki.org/wiki/2012_Occupy_Wall_Street_polls. And it can't be understated how crucial being able to better aggregate group judgements is to a well-functioning social movement. Given all of that, how would you want to compile such information into one or several articles? In general, I think it's a good idea to discuss how to compile information on previous uses and ways of implementing voting theory beyond governmental elections and ballot measures. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 06:33, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
| |||