User talk:Psephomancy: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→Criterion compliance logic: response) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 102:
Wikidata itself has [[d:Wikidata:Notability|the same notability rules as Wikipedia]], so we can't put newly-invented voting systems on there, but
it seems like we could access the existing info on Wikidata as well as the local database? I'm not sure how it all works yet. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 04:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
: Does Wikidata support implications or tagging data properties from the page itself? My thinking is that if users have to go to a separate page to fill in criterion compliances then they're probably not going to do it, and even less so if they manually have to keep the wiki page in sync with the data attributes. That's why Semantic Wiki seemed a better solution, but I see that it modifies Mediawiki too much. I'll investigate Cargo later. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 12:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
On another note, there's been a bit of back-and-forth at [[Sequentially Spent Score]]. I've been thinking about marking claims without evidence with some sort of "evidence needed" tag, in the vein of Wikipedia's citation needed tag. Can I go ahead and make such a template, and then make that the policy for claims without evidence? [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 12:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
| |||