User talk:Psephomancy: Difference between revisions
→OR/notability criteria
No edit summary |
|||
Line 150:
:: On the other hand, Wikipedia might have such problems itself. E.g. the Schulze STV "proof" that it is monotone (and that has propagated into its election methods comparison table), that Schulze said he doesn't know whether is true. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 11:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
::: Kristomun, I've edited the Schulze article to make it clear that "Smith-Schulze" (which I proposed) was not proposed or analyzed by Schulze. I did email him about it by the way, and he seemed okay with it being used as a teaching tool for people to understand Schulze. In the future, I suggest that it's a good idea to just make any concerns that you have known on the discussion page, or simply add disclaimers to the article. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 17:01, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
== Majority and utilitarianism ==
| |||