Venzke Bucklin Variant: Difference between revisions

Venzke Bucklin Variant (view source)

4 bytes added , 1 year ago

m

no edit summary

1,196

edits

Revision as of 18:19, 21 February 2012 (view source) imported>KVenzke (Tennessee) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 11:06, 22 July 2022 (view source) Kristomun (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: '''VBV''' (for "Venzke Bucklin Variant") is a three-slot method defined by [[Kevin Venzke]] as an attempt to improve the [[Later-no-harm]] performance of [[MCA]]. See also [[IBIFA]] by Chris Benham, which could be seen as a similar attempt that doesn't sacrifice [[FBC]] or [[monotonicity]]. ==Definition== Line 20: Memphis is the top-ratings winner, so we count all the preferences aside from the middle-slot Nashville preferences cast by the Memphis supporters. The result is that Chattanooga is the "tentative" winner, since all 58 non-Memphis voters voted for Chattanooga. Since Memphis is not winning, their middle slot preferences are counted. This brings Nashville's vote count up to 68 in comparison to Chattanooga's 58, so Nashville wins. [[Category:Single-winner voting ~~systems~~methods]]