Winner set: Difference between revisions

m
typoediting
No edit summary
m (typoediting)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:
A winner set is a set of candidates equal in size to the number of seats to be filled. When there is only one seat to be filled, it is customary to refer to a winner set simply as a candidate.
 
Winner sets feature prominently in discussions on who to elect in multi-winner [[Bloc voting|bloc voting]] methods and [[Proportional representation|proportional representation]] methods. Properties such as [[Stable Winner Set|stability]] and [[Proportionality for Solid Coalitions]] offer suggestions as to who should be in the winning winner set, with [[combinatorics]] and [[Set theory|set theory]] featuring prominently in the discussion.
 
[[Multi-member_system#Sequential_proportional_methods | Sequential proportional voting methods]] elect a winner set one candidate at a time, while optimal proportional methods involve evaluating every possible winner set. In the single-winner case, there are onlythe [numbersame nubmer of winner sets as candidates. [[Multi-member system]] winnersystems sets,must butuse therethe are[[ exponentiallyW:Combination more| winnercombinatorial setschoose withmethod]] moreas in "number of candidates '''''choose'''''<ref>https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Choose.html</ref> number of winners". For example, with 10 candidates and 3 winners, there are 120 possible winner sets since 10 choose 3 =120.
 
==References==
<references/>
 
Sequential proportional voting methods elect a winner set one candidate at a time, while optimal proportional methods involve evaluating every possible winner set. In the single-winner case, there are only [number of candidates] winner sets, but there are exponentially more winner sets with more winners. For example, with 10 candidates and 3 winners, there are 120 possible winner sets.
[[Category:Proportionality-related concepts]]
1,196

edits