Woodall's method: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (or vice versa) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Definitions and important properties of '''Woodall's Method''' and two similar methods: |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Do IRV till only one member of the initial Smiths set remains |
Do IRV till only one member of the initial Smiths set remains |
||
un-eliminated. Elect hir. |
un-eliminated. Elect hir. |
||
| Line 32: | Line 30: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
A few properties of Woodall |
=== A few properties of Woodall === |
||
Woodall meets the Mutual Majority Criterion (MMC), and has no chicken |
Woodall meets the Mutual Majority Criterion (MMC), and has no chicken |
||
dilemma. Woodall meets the Condorcet Criterion (CC), and the Smith Criterion. |
dilemma. Woodall meets the Condorcet Criterion (CC), and the Smith Criterion. |
||
| Line 93: | Line 90: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
== Benham's method: == |
|||
Benham is a method similar to Woodall. Benham can be defined a bit |
Benham is a method similar to Woodall. Benham can be defined a bit |
||
more briefly, because it doesn't mention the Smith set, though Benham, |
more briefly, because it doesn't mention the Smith set, though Benham, |
||
| Line 136: | Line 132: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
== Schwartz Woodall == |
|||
{{Merge to|Schwartz Woodall|date=August 2019}} |
{{Merge to|Schwartz Woodall|date=August 2019}} |
||