2012 Occupy Wall Street polls: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Preliminary pilot study == |
== Preliminary pilot study == |
||
They first polled |
They first polled 316 people at Occupy protest sites and events around Manhattan, in the spring of 2012, to test the software and people's reactions.<ref name=":1" /> |
||
In this poll, voters selected a candidate under Plurality voting, and then were randomly assigned two of the other voting systems.<ref name=":2">https://electology.org/sites/default/files/Full%20Report.pdf</ref> |
|||
"If this year's elections were held today, what party's candidates would you favor?" with candidates:<ref name=":2" /> |
|||
* Democratic Party |
|||
* Green Party |
|||
* Independent candidates |
|||
* Republican Party |
|||
* Libertarian Party |
|||
* Socialist Party |
|||
* A write-in option |
|||
No adjustment was made to correct for the unrepresentativeness of the voters; who were primarily OWS participants;<ref name=":2" /> it was just to compare voting behavior under different systems.<ref name=":0">https://electology.org/podcasts/2012-08-20_tj_rawls</ref> |
|||
The votes were tallied by hand, and it was much easier to tally the Approval and Score votes than the Instant-Runoff votes (which required 13 elimination rounds to find a winner).<ref name=":0" /> |
The votes were tallied by hand, and it was much easier to tally the Approval and Score votes than the Instant-Runoff votes (which required 13 elimination rounds to find a winner).<ref name=":0" /> |
||
The Democratic Party won the plurality election by a small margin, with a total of 35% of the votes. The Green Party won under the other 3 methods.<ref name=":2" /> |
|||
== Exit poll == |
== Exit poll == |
||
On Election Day, November 6, 2012, they polled over 300 voters using custom software on |
On Election Day, November 6, 2012, they polled over 300 voters using custom software on iPads in Manhattan's left-leaning 69th Assembly District. |
||
In this poll, every voter participated in all 4 voting systems.<ref name=":2" /> |
|||
No adjustment was made to correct for the unrepresentativeness of the district, though polling only took place in a single district, so that the poll's plurality results could be compared with the results of the actual election in that district (and they were well-correlated).<ref name=":1" /> |
No adjustment was made to correct for the unrepresentativeness of the district, though polling only took place in a single district, so that the poll's plurality results could be compared with the results of the actual election in that district (and they were well-correlated).<ref name=":1" /> |
||
Line 18: | Line 32: | ||
{{Reflist}} |
{{Reflist}} |
||
http://manhattanlp.org/occupy-wall-streets-tj-frawley-on-how-to-fix-the-us-electoral-system/ |
http://manhattanlp.org/occupy-wall-streets-tj-frawley-on-how-to-fix-the-us-electoral-system/ |
||
https://electology.org/podcasts/2012-08-20_tj_rawls |
|||
https://electology.org/podcasts/2013-05-27_tj_frawls |
|||
https://electology.org/sites/default/files/Full%20Report.pdf |
|||
http://web.archive.org/web/20130728110015/http://www.paercom.net/downloads/files/Press%20Release.pdf |
http://web.archive.org/web/20130728110015/http://www.paercom.net/downloads/files/Press%20Release.pdf |