2018 Washington 10th CD Straw Poll: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (Add subcategories (FPTP elections doesn't deserve a category?)) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→Results: image) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Results == |
== Results == |
||
[[File:2018 straw poll results WA 10th CD.png|thumb|Straw poll results]] |
|||
The Independent Progressive candidate won by a large margin, and the Republican candidate came in last, under all 3 voting systems. The Democrat came in 2nd place under FPTP, but under Approval and Score, the Independent Centrist took 2nd place, beating the Democrat. |
The Independent Progressive candidate won by a large margin, and the Republican candidate came in last, under all 3 voting systems. The Democrat came in 2nd place under FPTP, but under Approval and Score, the Independent Centrist took 2nd place, beating the Democrat. |
||
Revision as of 04:00, 6 September 2018
Counted (which advocates for Score voting) held a straw poll in the 10th Congressional District of Washington on June 30, 2018, after giving candidates a chance to speak in front of the voters. 38 eligible voters participated.
Ballots included three voting systems: Plurality/FPTP, Approval, and Score (0-5), so that voter behavior on the different types of ballots could be compared.
Results
The Independent Progressive candidate won by a large margin, and the Republican candidate came in last, under all 3 voting systems. The Democrat came in 2nd place under FPTP, but under Approval and Score, the Independent Centrist took 2nd place, beating the Democrat.
Analysis
They published analyses of voter behavior:
- Bullet voting and anti-bullet voting
- Min/Max voting and use of Score's expressiveness
- Subjectivity of scales and approval thresholds
Summary of voter behavior:
- 11% of voters bullet voted (giving the maximum score to one candidate and minimum or blanks to the others).
- 0% of voters anti-voted (giving the minimum score to one candidate and maximum scores to the others).
- 0% of voters min/max voted (approval-style votes, where all candidates get either maximum or minimum scores).
- 42% of voters did not use the full range of scores available.
- Voters did not have the same approval thresholds when converting their score ballots to approval ballots (even with the same score ballots).