3-2-1 voting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Delegated 3-2-1: Added additional clarification between “ratings” from voters and “pre-ratings” from candidates.) |
(→Footnote ¹: Blank ratings: The description of the tally was changed in a previous edit that removed “steps”. I updated this paragraph to match that change. I also changed Amy to Dana so the names of the 2 candidates don’t start with the same letter.) |
||
Line 25:
In this method, each candidate can pre-rate other candidates "OK", "conditionally OK", or "bad". If they do not explicitly pre-rate, they are considered to pre-rate all others "conditionally OK". Once all pre-ratings have been submitted, all "conditionally OK" pre-ratings are turned to "Bad" if the pre-rating coming from the other candidate is "Bad", and to "OK" otherwise. For example, if candidate A pre-rates candidate B "conditionally OK" and B pre-rates A "bad", A's pre-rating of B turns to "bad"; if A pre-rates B "conditionally OK" and B pre-rates A "OK" or "conditionally OK", A's pre-rating of B turns to "OK". Candidate pre-ratings are public information.
When a voter leaves a candidate X blank/unrated, and rates exactly one other candidate Y as "Good", that counts as rating X as "OK" if Y pre-rated X "OK". Otherwise, it counts as rating X "Bad". Implicit OKs in this sense are counted as lower than explicit OKs in
For example, if I rated only Aurelio "good" and left Beth and Chung blank; and Aurelio pre-rated Beth as "OK" and Chung as "Bad", then I'd count as giving those ratings. If I'd also rated
=== Undelegated 3-2-1 ===
|