Approval voting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*Chattanooga: 58 total votes |
*Chattanooga: 58 total votes |
||
*Knoxville: 32 total votes |
*Knoxville: 32 total votes |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
==Potential for tactical voting== |
==Potential for tactical voting== |
||
Approval voting passes a form of the [[monotonicity criterion]], in that voting for a candidate never lowers that candidate's chance of winning. Indeed, there is never a reason for a voter to [[tactical voting|tactically vote]] for a candidate X without voting for all candidates he or she prefers to candidate X. Approval voting satisfies the [[monotonicity criterion]], the [[participation criterion]], the [[Consistency Criterion]], the [[summability criterion]], the [[Weak Defensive Strategy criterion]], [[Independence of irrelevant alternatives]], the [[Non-compulsory support criterion]] and the [[Independence of equivalent candidates criterion]]. |
Approval voting passes a form of the [[monotonicity criterion]], in that voting for a candidate never lowers that candidate's chance of winning. Indeed, there is never a reason for a voter to [[tactical voting|tactically vote]] for a candidate X without voting for all candidates he or she prefers to candidate X. Approval voting satisfies the [[monotonicity criterion]], the [[participation criterion]], the [[Consistency Criterion]], the [[summability criterion]], the [[Weak Defensive Strategy criterion]], [[Independence of irrelevant alternatives]], the [[Non-compulsory support criterion]] and the [[Independence of equivalent candidates criterion]]. |
||
. |
. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
===Some Strategy for Voters === |
===Some Strategy for Voters === |