Arrow's impossibility theorem: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>Abd m (→External links: correct to URL that works) |
imported>Homunq |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
With a narrower definition of “irrelevant alternatives” which excludes those candidates in the [[Smith set]], some [[Condorcet method]]s meet all the criteria. |
With a narrower definition of “irrelevant alternatives” which excludes those candidates in the [[Smith set]], some [[Condorcet method]]s meet all the criteria. |
||
==Systems which violate only one of Arrow's criteria== |
|||
[[MCA|MCA-P]], as a rated rather than ranked system, violates only unrestricted domain. A system which arbitrarily chose two candidates to go into a runoff would violate only sovereignty. [[Random ballot]] violates only non-dictatorship. None of the methods described on this wiki violate only monotonicity. The [[Schulze method]] violates only independence of irrelevant alternatives, although it actually satisfies the similar [[ISDA|independence of Smith-dominated alternatives]] criterion. |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |