Bucklin voting: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

Bucklin is a [[voting system]] that can be used for single-member districts and also multi-member districts. It is also known as the Grand Junction system after Grand Junction, Colorado, where it was first proposed.

Bucklin is a [[voting system]] that can be used for single-member districts and also multi-member districts. It is also known as the Grand Junction system after Grand Junction, Colorado, where it was first proposed. It is closely related to [[Majority Choice Approval]] (MCA), which can be considered a form of Bucklin in which equal rankings are allowed. Modern theorists prefer MCA for its greater compliance with criteria.

== How ~~does~~ it work? ==

== How did it work? ==

Voters ~~are~~ allowed [[Preferential_voting|rank preference ballots]] - first, second, third.

Voters were allowed [[Preferential_voting|rank preference ballots]] - first, second, third. In some cases, voters were allowed multiple rankings at the third rank, although there is no record of the use of MCA, which allows equal ranking at all levels.

First choice votes ~~are~~ first counted. If one candidate ~~has~~ a majority, that candidate ~~wins~~. Otherwise the second choices ~~are~~ added to the first choices. Again, if a candidate with a majority vote is found, the winner is the candidate with the most votes in that round. Lower rankings ~~are~~ added as needed.

First choice votes were first counted. If one candidate had a majority, that candidate won. Otherwise the second choices were added to the first choices. Again, if a candidate with a majority vote was found, the winner was the candidate with the most votes in that round. Lower rankings were added as needed.

A majority is defined as half the number of voters, similar to [[absolute majority]]. Since after the first round there ~~are~~ more votes cast than voters, it is possible more than one candidate to have majority support.

A majority was defined as half the number of voters, similar to [[absolute majority]]. Since after the first round there were more votes cast than voters, it was possible more than one candidate to have majority support.

For multi-member districts, voters ~~mark~~ as many first choices as there are seats to be filled. Voters ~~mark~~ the same number of second and further choices. In some localities, the voter was required to mark a full set of first choices for his or her ballot to be valid.

For multi-member districts, voters marked as many first choices as there are seats to be filled. Voters marked the same number of second and further choices. In some localities, the voter was required to mark a full set of first choices for his or her ballot to be valid.

== Where is it used? ==

== Where was it used? ==

This method was apparently first used in Geneva during the French Revolution, in the period from 1792 to 1798, at the suggestion of the Marquis de Condorcet. This was a time of upheaval and experiment, and this usage has only recently come to light again.

Line 55:

Voters supporting a strong candidate have a advantage to "Bullet Vote" (Only offer one ranking), in hopes that other voters will add enough votes to help their candidate win. This strategy is most secure if the supported candidate appears likely to gain many second rank votes.

In the above example, Memphis voters have the most first place votes and might not offer a second preference in hopes of winning, but it fails because they are not a second favorite from competitors.

In the above example, Memphis voters have the most first place votes and might not offer a second preference in hopes of winning, but this attempted strategy fails because they are not a second favorite from competitors.

== See also ==