Cardinal-weighted pairwise comparison: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 00:59, 28 July 2005 (view source) imported>James Green-Armytage (→‎Approval-weighted pairwise) ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:35, 4 December 2005 (view source) imported>MarkusSchulze (→‎Cardinal-weighted pairwise) Newer edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:
	'''For each voter who ranks A over B, and only for these voters, subtract B’s rating from A’s rating, to get the rating differential. Sum these rating differentials to get the defeat strength.'''		'''For each voter who ranks A over B, and only for these voters, subtract B’s rating from A’s rating, to get the rating differential. Sum these rating differentials to get the defeat strength.'''

	The name "cardinal pairwise" also implies that a Smith-efficient, defeat-dropping base method will be used, for example [[~~beatpath~~]], [[ranked pairs]], or [[river]].		The name "cardinal pairwise" also implies that a Smith-efficient, defeat-dropping base method will be used, for example [[Schulze method\|Schulze]], [[ranked pairs]], or [[river]].