Cardinal-weighted pairwise comparison: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>James Green-Armytage m (→External resources: link to VM main page) |
imported>James Green-Armytage No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Cardinal-weighted pairwise == |
|||
"'''Cardinal pairwise'''" and "'''CWP'''" are shorter names for "cardinal-weighted pairwise comparison", a method first proposed by James Green-Armytage in June of 2004. |
"'''Cardinal pairwise'''" and "'''CWP'''" are shorter names for "cardinal-weighted pairwise comparison", a method first proposed by James Green-Armytage in June of 2004. |
||
| Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
The name "cardinal pairwise" also implies that a Smith-efficient, defeat-dropping base method will be used, for example [[beatpath]], [[ranked pairs]], or [[river]]. |
The name "cardinal pairwise" also implies that a Smith-efficient, defeat-dropping base method will be used, for example [[beatpath]], [[ranked pairs]], or [[river]]. |
||
== Approval-weighted pairwise == |
|||
"'''Approval weighted pairwise''', or '''AWP''', is the special case of cardinal pairwise in which the only available ratings are 0 and 1. AWP can use a ranked ballot with an approval cutoff. |
|||
== External resources == |
== External resources == |
||