Chicken dilemma: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
imported>MichaelOssipoff
No edit summary
Line 5:
'''Supporting definitions:'''
 
1. The A voters are the voters who prefer candidate A to everyone else. The B voters are the voters who prefer candidate B to everyone else. The C voters are the voters who prefer C to everyone else.
 
32. A particular voter votes sincerely if s/he doesn't falsify a
2. The "other candidates" are the candidates other than A and B.
 
3. A particular voter votes sincerely if s/he doesn't falsify a
preference, or fail to vote a felt preference that the balloting
system in use would have allowed hir to vote in addition to the
Line 16 ⟶ 14:
'''Premise:'''
 
1. There are 3 candidates: A, B, and C.
1. The A voters and the B voters, combined, add up to more than half
 
12. The A voters and the B voters, combined, add up to more than half
of the voters in the election.
 
23. The A voters and the B voters all prefer both A and B to the otherC.
candidates.
 
34. The A voters are more numerous than are the B voters.
 
45. Voting is sincere, except that the B voters refuse to vote A over anyone.
 
56. Candidate A would be the unique winner under sincere voting (...in
other words, if the B voters voted sincerely, as do all the other
voters).
 
7. The C voters are indifferent between A and B, and vote neither over the other.
 
'''Requirement:'''
Line 45 ⟶ 46:
'''Some methods that pass the Chicken Dilemma Criterion:'''
 
ICT, [[Symmetrical ICT]], [[MMPO]], MDDTR, [[IRV]], [[Benham's method]], [[Woodall's method]]

Revision as of 16:28, 9 January 2014

Definition

Supporting definitions:

1. The A voters are the voters who prefer candidate A to everyone else. The B voters are the voters who prefer candidate B to everyone else. The C voters are the voters who prefer C to everyone else.

2. A particular voter votes sincerely if s/he doesn't falsify a preference, or fail to vote a felt preference that the balloting system in use would have allowed hir to vote in addition to the preferences that s/he actually votes.

Premise:

1. There are 3 candidates: A, B, and C.

2. The A voters and the B voters, combined, add up to more than half of the voters in the election.

3. The A voters and the B voters all prefer both A and B to C.

4. The A voters are more numerous than are the B voters.

5. Voting is sincere, except that the B voters refuse to vote A over anyone.

6. Candidate A would be the unique winner under sincere voting (...in other words, if the B voters voted sincerely, as do all the other voters).

7. The C voters are indifferent between A and B, and vote neither over the other.

Requirement:

B doesn't win.

[end of CD definition]



In the chicken dilemma scenario described in the premise of the Chicken Dilemma Criterion (CD) defined above, if B won, then the B voters would have successfully taken advantage of the A voters' co-operativeness. The A voters wanted to vote both A and B over the candidates disliked by both the A voters and B voters. Thereby they helped {A,B} against worse candidates. But, with methods that fail CD, the message is "You help, you lose".


Some methods that pass the Chicken Dilemma Criterion:

ICT, Symmetrical ICT, MMPO, MDDTR, IRV, Benham's method, Woodall's method