Defeat-dropping Condorcet methods: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Many defeat-droppers are [[Smith-efficient]] simply because candidates in the Smith set have no defeats to be dropped against candidates not in the Smith set. |
Many defeat-droppers are [[Smith-efficient]] simply because candidates in the Smith set have no defeats to be dropped against candidates not in the Smith set. |
||
All defeat-droppers' final results can be visualized by showing the matchups between the candidates and which matchups the method dropped. |
All defeat-droppers' final results can be visualized by showing the matchups between the candidates and which matchups the method dropped. For example, with [[Smith-Schulze]], ignoring pairwise losses or ties: |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|+ |
|||
! |
|||
!A |
|||
!B |
|||
!C |
|||
!D |
|||
!E |
|||
!F |
|||
!G |
|||
|- |
|||
|A |
|||
| |
|||
|Win |
|||
|F-Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|- |
|||
|B |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
|Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|- |
|||
|C |
|||
|<s>Win</s> |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
|Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|- |
|||
|D |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
|Win |
|||
|F-Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|- |
|||
|E |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
|Win |
|||
|Win |
|||
|- |
|||
|F |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
|<s>Win</s> |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
|Win |
|||
|- |
|||
|G |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
|} |
|||
"F-Win" here refers to a defeat that is "flipped" into a win i.e. the defeat was dropped by Smith-Schulze. Note that, for example, C's pairwise victory over A is crossed out, with A being ranked above C; this is because A's actual loss to C was flipped into a win, giving A pairwise "victories" against every candidate, thus they are a Condorcet winner and are at the top of the table; also, B beats C, and B beats everyone other than A, B, or C, so B is also ranked above C, but below A. |