Definite Majority Choice: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>Araucaria |
imported>Araucaria No edit summary |
||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
==== Pairwise Ties ==== |
==== Pairwise Ties ==== |
||
When there are no ties, the winner is the candidate in Forest Simmon's '''[http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Techniques_of_method_design#Special_sets P]''' set, the ''set of candidates which are not definitively defeated''. |
When there are no ties, the winner is the candidate in Forest Simmon's '''[http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Techniques_of_method_design#Special_sets P]''' set, the ''set of candidates which are not definitively defeated''. |
||
In the event of a pairwise tie or near tie (say, margin within 0.01%), it is sometimes possible to proceed anyway, since another member of P may defeat the tied pair. But if there is no clear winner, ties should be handled using the same [http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Maximize_Affirmed_Majorities#Compute_Tiebreak Random Ballot] procedure as in [[Maximize Affirmed Majorities]]. |
In the event of a pairwise tie or near tie (say, margin within 0.01%), it is sometimes possible to proceed anyway, since another member of P may defeat the tied pair. But if there is no clear winner, ties should be handled using the same [http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Maximize_Affirmed_Majorities#Compute_Tiebreak Random Ballot] procedure as in [[Maximize Affirmed Majorities]]. |
||
== See Also == |
|||
* [[Imagine Democratic Fair Choice]]: a method that picks its winner from the same P set as DMC. It has a much simpler ballot. |
|||
[[Category:Condorcet method]] |
[[Category:Condorcet method]] |