Definite Majority Choice: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
imported>Araucaria
No edit summary
imported>Araucaria
No edit summary
Line 241: Line 241:


==== Pairwise Ties ====
==== Pairwise Ties ====
When there are no ties, the winner is the candidate in Forest Simmon's '''[http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Techniques_of_method_design#Special_sets P]''' set, the ''set of candidates which are not definitively defeated''.
When there are no ties, the winner is the least approved candidate in the [[Techniques_of_method_design#Special_sets|P]]) set.


In the event of a pairwise tie or near tie (say, margin within 0.01%), it is sometimes possible to proceed anyway, since another member of P may defeat the tied pair. But if there is no clear winner, ties should be handled using the same [http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Maximize_Affirmed_Majorities#Compute_Tiebreak Random Ballot] procedure as in [[Maximize Affirmed Majorities]].
In the event of a pairwise tie or a disputed pairwise contest (say, margin within 0.01%) among two members of the definite majority set, one of which is the least-approved member of the definite majority set, there is no clear winner. In that case, the tied contest could be handled using the same [http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Maximize_Affirmed_Majorities#Compute_Tiebreak Random Ballot] procedure as in [[Maximize Affirmed Majorities]].

Or the election could be decided in that case using [[Imagine_Democratic_Fair_Choice|Democratic Fair Choice]], which chooses a winner by random ballot from among the definite majority set.


== See Also ==
== See Also ==