Distributed Score Voting: Difference between revisions
Change formulas in points 5 and 6 of the vote count.
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (User:Aldo Tragni, you can use interwiki links instead of URLs) |
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) (Change formulas in points 5 and 6 of the vote count.) |
||
Line 7:
==Procedure==
[[File:DVS
===Voting===
Each voter has 100 points to distribute among the candidates according to his preferences.
Line 26 ⟶ 27:
3) Convert the votes into a range form, assigning 0 points to the candidates with the lowest score and normalizing the remaining candidates, using the following formula:
M =
v0 = current value of candidate C, to be normalized.
Line 43 ⟶ 44:
5) If you want to have more winners, then remove the single-winner from all original votes, repeating the whole procedure from point 1.
The value W of each original vote
M = highest score among the candidates in the vote.
e = candidate's score eliminated.
W0 = previous value of W
W1 = new value of W
<math>
\begin{equation}
W1=W0+100\left( 1-\frac{e}{M}\right)
\end{equation}</math>
By repeating this process several times, you can get as many winners as you like, which will be those removed in point 5.
6) If you want to know the % of victory of the winning candidates then, in each original vote, you must remove all the candidates who haven’t won, and normalize
S = sum of the points left in the vote.
v0 = current value of candidate C, to be normalized.
v1 = value of candidate C, after normalization.
<math>
\begin{equation}
v1=\frac{v0}{S} \cdot 100
\end{equation}</math>
The sum of points for each candidate will indicate the % of victory.
===Head-to-head===
Line 86 ⟶ 113:
==Criteria==
Criteria met by DSV (single-winner):
*[[Majority criterion]]
Line 100 ⟶ 127:
*[[Pareto criterion]]
Criteria not met by DSV (single-winner):
*[[Participation criterion]]
*[[Consistency criterion]]
*[[Later-no-help criterion]]
*[[Favorite betrayal criterion]]
The first two unmet criteria
The last
===Tactical votes===
| |||