Distributed Voting: Difference between revisions
Some corrections in "Procedure specification"
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) (Fixed part regarding Equal Vote) |
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) (Some corrections in "Procedure specification") |
||
Line 52:
During counting, points can be represented in decimal form.
===Managing votes without 0 points===▼
If the only candidate C with 0 points is eliminated from a vote like this A[80] B[20] C[0], there are 2 forms that the vote can take:▼
# honest form: A[80] B[20]▼
# tactical form: A[100] B[0]▼
It's recommended to use the honest form, also because the vote from the beginning may not have candidates with 0 points
===Managing votes with 0 points===
Line 66 ⟶ 75:
* it can be considered not in accordance with the interests of the voter who, to those remaining candidates, had not awarded points.
The two procedures return the same winners, but in the [[Multi-Member System|multi-winner]] case the winners can have different % of victory; in this case it's better to use procedure 1 for the reasons indicated above.
▲===Managing votes without 0 points===
▲If the only candidate C with 0 points is eliminated from a vote like this A[80] B[20] C[0], there are 2 forms that the vote can take:
▲# honest form: A[80] B[20]
▲# tactical form: A[100] B[0]
▲It's recommended to use the honest form, also because the vote from the beginning may not have candidates with 0 points (possible case).
===Managing tie during the count===
Line 81:
Cases of parity can occur during counting, as in the following example:
* Vote 1: A[
* Vote 2: A[50] B[
* Sum of votes: A[
In this case, the worst candidate is both
==Other properties==
Line 115:
===About Equal Vote===
By "equal vote" or "
* In the
* During all the counting steps, through the use of normalization, it ensures that all voters continue to have 100 points each, always distributed according to their interests, therefore
* The result is one of the counting steps, in which
There is no passage in the
==Forum Debate==
| |||