4,193
edits
Effects of different voting systems under similar circumstances: Difference between revisions
Effects of different voting systems under similar circumstances (view source)
Revision as of 22:53, 19 February 2022
, 2 years agoThis article describes what is sometimes referred to as the "Tennessee example"
(→Multiple vote systems (ratings): renamed to "Cardinal voting systems", as "multiple" implies some form of one-person one-vote violation.) |
(This article describes what is sometimes referred to as the "Tennessee example") |
||
Line 1:
This article describes what is sometimes referred to as the "'''Tennessee example'''". It describes an example election using geographical proximity to create hypothetical preferences of a group of voters, and then compares the results of such preferences with ten different [[voting systems]]. It does not, however, address any of the voting systems that are based on [[proportional representation]].
'''Note that the examples given below may not reflect real-world elections, because, among other things, all of the ballots have only four unique sets of preferences.'''
| |||