4,193
edits
Electowiki talk:Editorial policy: Difference between revisions
→Anonymous editors and EPOV: new section
(Putting pointers back to older discussions on Electowiki_talk:Policy, and directing newer discussion about EPOV to this page) |
(→Anonymous editors and EPOV: new section) |
||
Line 6:
Please direct newer discussion about EPOV to this talk page. Thanks! -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 23:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
== Anonymous editors and EPOV ==
The [[Special:RecentChanges]] log has become dominated by edits from anonymous users. While I appreciate the value of anonymous editors in many contexts, and I believe that people who aren't at liberty to divulge their public identity should be able to participate, I tend to value the opinions of people who are willing to stake their personal reputation on their words. Having witnessed the dangers of undisclosed conflicts of interest on Wikipedia over the years, I'm always skeptical of people who hide behind pseudoanonymous identities.
Checking the validity of anonymously-contributed content is exhausting. It is not what I want to be doing with my life right now. However, because I personally own the domain names for electowiki.org and electorama.com, I have to. Whenever an anonmyous suggests allowing content on this wiki in languages that I don't understand, after having their content ''deleted'' in at least one case, it makes me trust that person a little bit less. Every kilobyte of anonymous content that gets added to Electowiki makes me dislike looking at [[Special:RecentChanges]]. My fear is that the quality of this wiki has been going down recently, but I honestly don't have enough time to read and understand it all. It's why I put "''Investigate what it would take to deploy [[wikipedia:Flagged Revisions]] to [[Electowiki:Electowiki|Electowiki]]''" on [[User:RobLa/TODO]].
[[User:Psephomancy]], I'm guessing you disagree with me about anonymous editors and contribution quality. I have several resolutions in mind for solving this problem, but I want to start with asking an open-ended question: what is your position on this? Back when I started Electorama.com in 2003, my hope was to create an activism infrastructure for the membership of [[EM list]]. When [[User:DanKeshet]] suggested creating a wiki, it seemed easy enough to do; [[wikipedia:Dreamhost|Dreamhost]] had pretty good MediaWiki support back in 2005. And wiki.electorama.com became a runaway success for a while. But the spam fighting got to be too much, and my cocktail of MediaWiki extensions stopped working well together. It effectively caused Electowiki to go dormant in 2011 or so. In 2017, I began personally working on a migration to GitHub's wiki infrastructure. When you and [[User:Homunq]] pinged me from time-to-time, and (at a couple of points) there were people at [[C4ES]] that suggested that I assign "electorama.com" to [[C4ES]]. I've considered it (and still consider it from time-to-time), but RobLa-POV and C4ES-POV are slightly different points of view.
[[User:Psephomancy]], I appreciate the work that did to evaluate MediaWiki hosting providers, and choosing [[Miraheze]]. I've been pretty happy with that decision, so much so that I [https://robla.blog/2019/12/23/why-donate-to-a-non-profit-with-a-hard-to-pronounce-name/ joined the Miraheze board]. I appreciate that the move to Miraheze has revitalized Electowiki, and I really appreciate the tireless work that you did in 2018 and 2019 to revitalize this community while I was focused on my day job. The modern [[Electowiki]] owes a lot to you, [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]].
The good news is that "Electowiki-POV" (what we now call "[[Electowiki:EPOV|EPOV]]") is largely compatible with RobLa-POV. "Electo'''rama'''-POV" is a bit more compatible with "RobLa-POV" than "Electowiki-POV", but the difference between "Electorama-POV" and "RobLa-POV" is pretty negligible. With all of the anonymous editing is starting to move away from that. The discussion over on [[Talk:C4ES Election-Theory Forum]] is really driving that point home. For my continued involvement/support, I think we need to better align RobLa-POV and Electowiki-POV, and I think the first step is for the EPOV editorial board to come up with a policy about anonymous editing. Thoughts on how the EPOV editorial board will define the policy on anonymous editing? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 22:54, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
| |||