Electowiki talk:Policy: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 05:44, 13 November 2006

Relevance to election methods

I just notice, the list of all articles seems to be almost entirely comprised of articles related to the science of election methods. I suppose, then, that articles like Robert's Rules of Order,VIRV, and Virginia would be out of place here? What do you think?

Is there another wiki that would be better suited to organizing for electoral reform? 24.154.8.81 08:31, 9 November 2006 (PST)

Electowiki is a great place to talk about electoral reform. Please continue. -- 71.231.224.29 21:44, 12 November 2006 (PST)

Revision as of 16:31, 9 November 2006 (view source) 24.154.8.81 (talk) (suitability of certain topics for this wiki)		Revision as of 05:44, 13 November 2006 (view source) 71.231.224.29 (talk) (re: relevance. Electowiki is a great place to talk about electoral reform. Please continue) Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Is there another wiki that would be better suited to organizing for electoral reform? [[User:24.154.8.81\|24.154.8.81]] 08:31, 9 November 2006 (PST)		Is there another wiki that would be better suited to organizing for electoral reform? [[User:24.154.8.81\|24.154.8.81]] 08:31, 9 November 2006 (PST)

			:Electowiki is a great place to talk about electoral reform. Please continue. -- [[User:71.231.224.29\|71.231.224.29]] 21:44, 12 November 2006 (PST)