Electowiki talk:Policy: Difference between revisions
→Articles about living people (BLP policy): Response to User:RobLa
(→Articles about living people (BLP policy): new section) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→Articles about living people (BLP policy): Response to User:RobLa) |
||
Line 14:
[[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]], do you agree with this policy? If so, then let's make this the policy as soon as possible (and let's figure out if/when/how we allow exceptions). -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 06:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
: In general, I think that anything that can be covered on Wikipedia should just be covered there, since it will be read by more people, maintained by more people, and won't duplicate effort.
: [[Warren Smith]] doesn't have an article there, for instance, and if one was created, it might be deleted for being "non-notable" (maybe, maybe not, depends what publications he's been mentioned in).
: So should we cover it here instead? I don't know.
: I certainly don't think we need any general biographical information, like about their family or sports accomplishments, etc. If anything exists here, it should be limited to only neutral and verifiable points that are related to election methods. (But even then, there could be neutral and verifiable facts about election reform organization drama that it's better not to mention.) — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 15:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
| |||