4,193
edits
(signing unsigned comment from Wegerje 06:10, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)) |
(a little reordering) |
||
Line 1:
__FORCETOC__ __NEWSECTIONLINK__
'''To start a new discussion, click the "Add topic" link at the top of this page.'''
== Goals ==▼
In the spirit of [http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?BeginWithTheEndInMind beginning with the end in mind], it behooves us to have measureable goals.▼
Suggested by [[User:Wegerje|Wegerje]] 06:10, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)▼
*Become the first page to appear in various Google searches.▼
*Become the source for links in the blogosphere (Often replacing [http://www.electionmethods.org/ Election Methods.org], no offense Russ)▼
*Providing from page one a clear and inviting path for those seeking:▼
**First time information about electoral methods and why and when some may be better than others▼
**Experts looking for well crafted information and in depth information on electoral knowledge▼
-- (''unsigned comment from [[User:Wegerje|Wegerje]] 06:10, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)'')▼
== Logo and theme ==
Line 41 ⟶ 29:
I agree that the Tennesee example is boring! Ideally, examples on each method page should be specifically designed to show particular features of that method. [[User:James Green-Armytage|James Green-Armytage]] 00:11, 19 May 2005 (PDT)
▲== Goals ==
▲In the spirit of [http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?BeginWithTheEndInMind beginning with the end in mind], it behooves us to have measureable goals.
▲Suggested by [[User:Wegerje|Wegerje]] 06:10, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)
▲*Become the first page to appear in various Google searches.
▲*Become the source for links in the blogosphere (Often replacing [http://www.electionmethods.org/ Election Methods.org], no offense Russ)
▲*Providing from page one a clear and inviting path for those seeking:
▲**First time information about electoral methods and why and when some may be better than others
▲**Experts looking for well crafted information and in depth information on electoral knowledge
▲-- (''unsigned comment from [[User:Wegerje|Wegerje]] 06:10, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)'')
== Advocacy/Propaganda development? ==
|