4,193
edits
Electowiki talk:The caucus: Difference between revisions
→Advocacy/Propaganda development?: the most important policy discussions about propaganda development are happening over on Electowiki:Policy
m (RobLa moved page Electowiki:The caucus to Electowiki talk:The caucus: It's a little too confusing to try sticking with enwiki's "Village Pump" norm) |
(→Advocacy/Propaganda development?: the most important policy discussions about propaganda development are happening over on Electowiki:Policy) |
||
Line 26:
:::: I like Homunq's idea of Friendly/Unfriendly edits and separating POVs into different articles. It should be possible [[Special:ManageWiki/namespaces|to make an Advocacy: or Opinion: namespace]]? So something like [[Advocacy:Problems with Instant-Runoff Voting]]
:::: Or maybe it could just be done with templates, like [[w:Template:Essay|Wikipedia's Essay template]], so it would be [[Problems with Instant-Runoff Voting]] with a big box at the top that says "This is an essay written by opponents of IRV and doesn't represent everyone else etc etc". — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 21:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
The current state (as of 01:34, 17 December 2019 (UTC)) is that most of the conversation has happened over at [[Electowiki_talk:Policy]], based around the edits made to [[Electowiki:Policy]]. My sense of things is that if we rely on a banner, the banner needs to identify a particular editor that is the lead signatory for the article. How can we make sure that future editing curators on this are excited to see new activity in [[Special:RecentChanges]], and build a sense of shared voice, based on the consensus of the [[Election-methods mailing list]] (or appropriate venue)? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 01:34, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
== Difference between this and wikipedia? ==
| |||