Evaluative Proportional Representation: Difference between revisions
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (add References section) |
m (Improved reference by filling in more information) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Evaluative Proportional Representation''' ('''EPR''') is |
'''Evaluative Proportional Representation''' ('''EPR''') is a proportional extension of [[Majority Judgment]], devised by Stephen Bosworth.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Stephen |last1=Bosworth |first2=Anders |last2=Corr |first3=Stevan |last3=Leonard |title=Legislatures Elected by Evaluative Proportional Representation (EPR): an Algorithm |url=http://www.jpolrisk.com/legislatures-elected-by-evaluative-proportional-representation-epr-an-algorithm-v2/|journal=Journal of Political Risk |volume=7 |number=8 |date=July 8, 2019 |access-date=August 19, 2019}}</ref> It is highly related to the [[Expanding Approvals Rule]]. |
||
Unlike EAR, it doesn't aim to ensure proportionality by seat count. Instead, EPR outputs a set of winners along with the weight that each winner should have in a collective decision process (e.g. in a council or by parliamentary procedure). |
|||
{{stub}} |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
||
<references/> |
<references/> |
||
[[Category:Multi-winner voting methods]] |
|||
[[Category:Ranked voting methods]] |
Latest revision as of 17:52, 5 June 2023
Evaluative Proportional Representation (EPR) is a proportional extension of Majority Judgment, devised by Stephen Bosworth.[1] It is highly related to the Expanding Approvals Rule.
Unlike EAR, it doesn't aim to ensure proportionality by seat count. Instead, EPR outputs a set of winners along with the weight that each winner should have in a collective decision process (e.g. in a council or by parliamentary procedure).
This page is a stub - please add to it.
References
- ↑ Bosworth, Stephen; Corr, Anders; Leonard, Stevan (July 8, 2019). "Legislatures Elected by Evaluative Proportional Representation (EPR): an Algorithm". Journal of Political Risk. 7 (8). Retrieved August 19, 2019.