Evaluative Proportional Representation: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary |
m (Improved reference by filling in more information) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Evaluative Proportional Representation''' ('''EPR''') is a proportional extension of [[Majority Judgment]]. |
'''Evaluative Proportional Representation''' ('''EPR''') is a proportional extension of [[Majority Judgment]], devised by Stephen Bosworth.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Stephen |last1=Bosworth |first2=Anders |last2=Corr |first3=Stevan |last3=Leonard |title=Legislatures Elected by Evaluative Proportional Representation (EPR): an Algorithm |url=http://www.jpolrisk.com/legislatures-elected-by-evaluative-proportional-representation-epr-an-algorithm-v2/|journal=Journal of Political Risk |volume=7 |number=8 |date=July 8, 2019 |access-date=August 19, 2019}}</ref> It is highly related to the [[Expanding Approvals Rule]]. |
||
Unlike EAR, it doesn't aim to ensure proportionality by seat count. Instead, EPR outputs a set of winners along with the weight that each winner should have in a collective decision process (e.g. in a council or by parliamentary procedure). |
Unlike EAR, it doesn't aim to ensure proportionality by seat count. Instead, EPR outputs a set of winners along with the weight that each winner should have in a collective decision process (e.g. in a council or by parliamentary procedure). |
||