Evaluative Proportional Representation: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (add References section) |
m (Clarify that this is a weighted PR method (like Chamberlin-Courant; unlike Monroe).) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Evaluative Proportional Representation''' ('''EPR''') is |
'''Evaluative Proportional Representation''' ('''EPR''') is a proportional extension of [[Majority Judgment]]. It is highly related to the [[Expanding Approvals Rule]].<ref>https://www.jpolrisk.com/legislatures-elected-by-evaluative-proportional-representation-epr-an-algorithm-v2/</ref> |
||
Unlike EAR, it doesn't aim to ensure proportionality by seat count. Instead, EPR outputs a set of winners along with the weight that each winner should have in a collective decision process (e.g. in a council or by parliamentary procedure). |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
||
<references/> |
<references/> |
||
[[Category:Multi-winner voting methods]] |
|||
[[Category:Ranked voting methods]] |
|||