FAIR-V: Difference between revisions
FAIR-Max diagram added
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) (Added FAIR-Max) |
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) (FAIR-Max diagram added) |
||
Line 1:
[[File:FAIR-V Procedure.svg|
[[File:FAIR-Max Procedure.svg|350px|thumb|right]]
First-Approval Instant-Runoff (FAIR) is a [[Single Member system|Single-Winner]] [[Cardinal voting systems]] proposed by [[User:Aldo Tragni|Aldo Tragni]].
Line 29 ⟶ 30:
First-Approval Instant-Runoff Voting:
* "First-Approval": the vote is initially treated as a multiple-choice. However, if all the worst candidates are eliminated in a vote, then the initial multiple-choice is reduced and can become a single-choice, during the count. It's like a single-choice (refer to [[FPTP|'''F'''PTP]]) masked at the beginning by multiple-choice (refer to [[Approval AV|'''A'''pproval voting]]).
* "
FAIR-
*FAIR-1V: it's equivalent to [[Approval AV|AV]], with ratings in [0,1].
*FAIR-V: is the default definition, with ratings in [0,3].
*FAIR-5V: uses ratings in [0,5].
Line 50:
''FAIR-Max resists maximization strategies (like FAIR-V), elect the utilitarian winner (much more than FAIR-V), but it's more complicated to explain (than FAIR-V).''
''FAIR-S: by removing step 2 from the list, the method resists a little less to maximization strategy, but becomes simpler and remains utilitarian.''
===mdM norm (min-do-Max norm)===
| |||