Later-no-harm criterion: Difference between revisions
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (wikipedia template) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<h4 class=left>Complying Methods</h4> |
<h4 class=left>Complying Methods</h4> |
||
<p>'''Later-no-harm''' is satisfied by [[IRV|Instant Runoff Voting]], [[Minmax|Minmax(pairwise opposition)]], and Douglas Woodall's [[Descending Solid Coalitions]] method. It is trivially satisfied by [[Plurality voting|First-Preference Plurality]] and [[Random Ballot]], since those methods do not usually regard lower preferences. Virtually every other method fails this criterion.</p> |
<p>'''Later-no-harm''' (usually LNH, but sometimes LNHa or LNHarm to avoid confusion with [[Later-no-help]]) is satisfied by [[IRV|Instant Runoff Voting]], [[Minmax|Minmax(pairwise opposition)]], and Douglas Woodall's [[Descending Solid Coalitions]] method. It is trivially satisfied by [[Plurality voting|First-Preference Plurality]] and [[Random Ballot]], since those methods do not usually regard lower preferences. Virtually every other method fails this criterion.</p> |
||
<h4 class=left>Commentary</h4> |
<h4 class=left>Commentary</h4> |
Revision as of 02:49, 22 March 2020
Statement of Criterion
Adding a preference to a ballot must not decrease the probability of election of any candidate ranked above the new preference.
Complying Methods
Later-no-harm (usually LNH, but sometimes LNHa or LNHarm to avoid confusion with Later-no-help) is satisfied by Instant Runoff Voting, Minmax(pairwise opposition), and Douglas Woodall's Descending Solid Coalitions method. It is trivially satisfied by First-Preference Plurality and Random Ballot, since those methods do not usually regard lower preferences. Virtually every other method fails this criterion.
Commentary
Later-no-harm guarantees that the method will not use a voter's lower preferences to elect a candidate who that voter likes less than the candidate that would have been elected if this voter had kept his lower preferences a secret.
As a result, voters may feel free to vote their complete ranking of the candidates, which in turn may give the election method more complete information to use to find a winner.
Later-no-harm is incompatible with the Condorcet criterion.