Majority Acceptable Score voting: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
imported>Homunq
imported>Homunq
(→‎An example: strategy)
Line 43: Line 43:
|bgcolor="#cfc"|83
|bgcolor="#cfc"|83
|-
|-
!bgcolor="#fff"|Chatanooga
!bgcolor="#fff"|Chattanooga
|bgcolor="#fff"|15
|bgcolor="#fff"|15
|bgcolor="#fff"|22
|bgcolor="#fff"|22
Line 61: Line 61:
</div>
</div>


Only Chatanooga is rated above 0 by a majority, so Chatanooga (the [[Condorcet winner]]) wins, even though Memphis has a slightly higher score.
Only Nashville is rated above 0 by a majority, so Nashville (the [[Condorcet winner]]) wins, even though Memphis has a slightly higher score.

If Memphis voters rated Nashville at 0 in the above scenario, they could cause Memphis to win. But Chattanooga and Knoxville voters could protect against this as long as at least 3/4 of them (24% from their combined total of 32%) gave Nashville a 1 (or a 2).


[[Category:Graded Bucklin systems]]
[[Category:Graded Bucklin systems]]