Majority Acceptable Score voting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>Homunq |
imported>Homunq No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Voters can give each candidate 0, 1, or 2 points. |
* Voters can give each candidate 0, 1, or 2 points. |
||
* If there are any candidates given ''above'' 0 by a majority, then all who aren't (that is, those with a majority ''at'' 0) |
* If there are any candidates given ''above'' 0 by a majority, then eliminate all who aren't (that is, those with a majority ''at'' 0). |
||
** (Do the same for 1. This probably doesn't matter, because any majority-2 candidate would probably win in the next step anyway. But this step is part of Bucklin voting, which was used in over a dozen US cities during the Progressive era, and thus it gives this method a stronger pedigree.) |
** (Do the same for 1. This probably doesn't matter, because any majority-2 candidate would probably win in the next step anyway. But this step is part of Bucklin voting, which was used in over a dozen US cities during the Progressive era, and thus it gives this method a stronger pedigree.) |
||
* The remaining candidate with the highest points wins. |
* The remaining candidate with the highest points wins. |
||