Majority Acceptable Score voting: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
imported>Homunq
imported>Homunq
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


* Voters can give each candidate 0, 1, or 2 points.
* Voters can give each candidate 0, 1, or 2 points.
* All candidates given 0 by a majority are eliminated, if any others would remain.
* If there are any candidates given *above* 0 by a majority, then all who aren't are eliminated.
** (If there are any candidates given 2 by a majority, you should eliminate any who aren't. But a majority-2 candidate would probably win in the next step anyway, so this step is probably superfluous. It's just included because it's part of Bucklin voting, which was used in over a dozen US cities, and thus it gives this method a stronger pedigree.)
** (Do the same for 1. This probably doesn't matter, because a majority-2 candidate would probably win in the next step anyway. But this step is part of Bucklin voting, which was used in over a dozen US cities during the Progressive era, and thus it gives this method a stronger pedigree.)
* The remaining candidate with the highest points wins.
* The remaining candidate with the highest points wins.