Majority Choice Approval: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
All of the methods are [[Summability criterion|summable]] for counting at the precinct level. Only MCA-IR actually requires a matrix (or, possibly two counting rounds), and is thus "[[Summability criterion|summable for k=2]]"; the others require only O(N) tallies, and are thus "[[Summability criterion|summable for k=1]]". |
All of the methods are [[Summability criterion|summable]] for counting at the precinct level. Only MCA-IR actually requires a matrix (or, possibly two counting rounds), and is thus "[[Summability criterion|summable for k=2]]"; the others require only O(N) tallies, and are thus "[[Summability criterion|summable for k=1]]". |
||
MCA fails the [[participation criterion]] and its stronger cousin the [[consistency |
MCA fails the [[participation criterion]] and its stronger cousin the [[consistency criterion]], although MCA-P only fails participation if the additional vote causes an approval majority.{{Clarify|date=May 2024}} |
||
MCA is not a [[later-no-harm criterion|later-no-harm]] system. |
|||
MCA can also satisfy: |
MCA can also satisfy: |
||