Majority criterion: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
The [[Condorcet criterion]] implies the majority criterion. Practically every serious ranked voting method passes the majority criterion. Most [[Cardinal voting|rated voting]] methods fail the majority criterion, such as [[Approval voting|Approval]], [[Score]], and [[STAR voting]], though this is argued to be a good thing in situations where those methods elect a candidate who is well-liked by all voters rather than a candidate who is narrowly preferred by a majority but loathed by the minority.
The [[Condorcet criterion]] implies the majority criterion. Practically every serious ranked voting method passes the majority criterion. Most [[Cardinal voting|rated voting]] methods fail the majority criterion, such as [[Approval voting|Approval]], [[Score]], and [[STAR voting]], though this is argued to be a good thing in situations where those methods elect a candidate who is well-liked by all voters rather than a candidate who is narrowly preferred by a majority but loathed by the minority.


Example:
Example:<blockquote>51 A

51 A


25 B>C
25 B>C


24 C>B</blockquote>51 voters out of 100 prefer A over all others (B and C), therefore A must win by the majority criterion.
24 C>B

51 voters prefer A over all others (B and C), therefore A must win by the majority criterion.




Line 23: Line 19:
with the likely most general interpretation of "vote ahead of" being "ranked or rated higher than".
with the likely most general interpretation of "vote ahead of" being "ranked or rated higher than".


=== The majority criterion for rated ballots ===
The majority criterion for rated ballots is a weaker, separate criterion which says that a candidate given a perfect (maximal) rating by a majority of voters must win if no other candidate received a perfect rating from that majority.
The majority criterion for rated ballots is a weaker, separate criterion which says that a candidate given a perfect (maximal) rating by a majority of voters must win if no other candidate received a perfect rating from that majority.


The difference between the two versions can be seen with this example:
The difference between the two versions can be seen with this example: <blockquote>51 A:1

51 A:1

49 B:5


If the highest score is a 5, then the majority criterion for rated ballots allows either A or B to win. This is in contrast to the regular majority criterion, which requires A to win. Arguably, the majority criterion for rated ballots is more appropriate in the context of rated ballots, since a voter who doesn't give their 1st choice a perfect score is essentially choosing not to use all of their voting power, and thus their preference need not be (or even perhaps, shouldn't) be maximally respected or enforced.
49 B:5 </blockquote>If the highest score is a 5, then the majority criterion for rated ballots allows either A or B to win. This is in contrast to the regular majority criterion, which requires A to win. Arguably, the majority criterion for rated ballots is more appropriate in the context of rated ballots, since a voter who doesn't give their 1st choice a perfect score is essentially choosing not to use all of their voting power, and thus their preference need not be (or even perhaps, shouldn't) be maximally respected or enforced.


== Notes ==
== Notes ==