4,193
edits
Method evaluation poll 2005: Difference between revisions
Added introduction to article, and highlighted that this poll is no longer active
(Added introduction to article, and highlighted that this poll is no longer active) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
This was a "method evaluation poll" that was conducted in starting in 2005. The participants were largely contributors to the [[election-methods mailing list]], and responses largely faded out by 2006. This page remained unedited for many years after 2006.
Please rate the following single-winner methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on '''functional merit alone'''. That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate? Decimal ratings are allowed.▼
== The 2005 poll ==
▲Respondents were given the following instructions<blockquote>Please rate the following single-winner methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on '''functional merit alone'''. That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate? Decimal ratings are allowed.
The answers you give on your first pass through the survey need not be final. Please feel free to change/update your answers as many times as you like. You may leave a question mark next to your score for a given method if you are particularly uncertain about that score, and you may also substitute a question mark for the number if you feel unable to evalute the method.
Feel free to add more methods to the poll, especially interesting ones! This goes without saying, but please don't change other people's ratings! Try to keep the columns tidy so that it's clear whose scores are whose. The format of this poll is based on that of the [[Essential Questions|essential questions]] poll. Please identify yourself by your initials in the body of the poll, and in the participants section at the top of the poll. This poll will be ongoing; that is, it has no closing date. Also, there is no official tally method, and no official winner will be declared.</blockquote>The results were collected in late 2005.
== the participants ==
Line 158 ⟶ 161:
*[[Essential Questions]] poll
*[[Method support poll]]
*[[Method evaluation poll 2008]]
[[Category:Advocacy]]
| |||