Method evaluation poll 2005

Particlar methods

Please rate the following methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on merit alone (That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate?)

binary input

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO

Plurality

Two round runoff

Approval

ranking input

not Condorcet-efficient

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO

Borda count

IRV without equal rankings

ER-IRV(whole)

ER-IRV(fractional)

nearly Condorcet-efficient

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO

minmax(pairwise opposition)

CDTT,IRV

Condorcet-efficient

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO

ranked pairs(WV)

ranked pairs(margins)

beatpath(WV)

beatpath(margins)

sequential dropping(WV)

minmax(WV)

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO

minmax(margins)

Smith//minmax(WV)

Smith//minmax(margins)

Nanson

Raynaud

ranking input with approval cutoff

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO

Definite majority choice

Approval weighted pairwise

Approval margins

rating input

   SR  JH  JG  KV MO

range voting

ranked pairs(cardinal pairwise)

beatpath(cardinal pairwise)

other

CWO-ER-IRV(whole)

CWO-ER-IRV(fractional)

CWO-ranked pairs(WV)

CWO-ranked ballot plurality

minmax(pairwise opposition) with AERLO and ATLO

beatpath(WV)with AERLO and ATLO