Method support poll: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
*Pairwise comparison methods enhanced with additional approval or rating information: ok as well if not too complex for the voters |
*Pairwise comparison methods enhanced with additional approval or rating information: ok as well if not too complex for the voters |
||
*[[Approval voting|Approval]]: clean method and at least some improvement to the commonly user methods |
*[[Approval voting|Approval]]: clean method and at least some improvement to the commonly user methods |
||
*[[IRV]] methods (if |
*Best [[IRV]] methods (if pairwise comparison based methods are out of question) |
||
Close to supporting: [[Runoff voting|Two round system]] (not that bad for multiparty countries) |
Close to supporting: [[Runoff voting|Two round system]] (not that bad for multiparty countries) |
||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
*'''Kevin Venzke''' |
*'''Kevin Venzke''' |
||
Support open party list (approval component), closed party list, possibly a proportional approval scheme |
Support open party list (approval component), closed party list, possibly a proportional approval scheme |
||
*'''Juho Laatu''' |
|||
Support: |
|||
*Open party list enhanced with hierarchical structure |
|||
*[[Open list|Open party list]] |
|||
*[[STV]] (non-party-based votes are both good and bad) |
|||
*Regional representation (various styles to complement other methods) |
|||
Close to supporting: [[Closed list|Closed party list]], [[CPO-STV]] (complexity problems) |
|||
Not supporting: Two party methods (ok if kept intentionally, not just because of fear of changes or to stay in power) |
|||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||