Party-list proportional representation: Difference between revisions
imported>WikipediaBot m (importing text from Wikipedia) |
imported>DanKeshet (rm wpisms) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Party-list proportional representation''' systems are a family of voting systems used in multiple-winner |
'''Party-list proportional representation''' systems are a family of voting systems used in multiple-winner elections (e.g. elections to parliament), emphasizing [[proportional representation]]. In these systems, parties make lists of candidates to be elected, and seats get allocated to each party in proportion to the number of votes the party receives. Voters may vote directly for the party, like in Israel, or they may vote for candidates and that vote will pool to the party, like in Turkey and Finland. The order in which the party's list candidates get elected may be pre-determined by some method internal to the party (a [[closed list]] system) or they may be determined by the voters at large (an [[open list]] system). |
||
[[Image:ElezioneBrunate.jpg|right|thumb|a poster for the European Parliament election 2004 in Italy, showing party lists]] |
[[Image:ElezioneBrunate.jpg|right|thumb|a poster for the European Parliament election 2004 in Italy, showing party lists]] |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* The [[d'Hondt method]], used in [[Israel]], [[Austria]] and [[Poland]], among other places; |
* The [[d'Hondt method]], used in [[Israel]], [[Austria]] and [[Poland]], among other places; |
||
* The [[Sainte-Laguë method]], used in many [[Scandinavia | Scandinavian]] countries, [[New Zealand]], and the German Federal State [[Bremen]]; and |
* The [[Sainte-Laguë method]], used in many [[Scandinavia | Scandinavian]] countries, [[New Zealand]], and the German Federal State [[Bremen]]; and |
||
* The [[largest remainder method]]. |
* The [[largest remainder method]]. |
||
List PR may also be combined in various hybrids (e.g. using the [[Additional member system]]). |
List PR may also be combined in various hybrids (e.g. using the [[Additional member system]]). |
||
The unmodified Sainte-Laguë method and the LR-Hare method rank as the most proportional followed by LR-Droop; [[single transferable vote]]; modified Sainte-Laguë, d'Hondt and largest remainder Imperiali. While the allocation formula is important, equally important is the district magnitude (number of seats in a constituency). The higher the district magnitude, the more proportional |
The unmodified Sainte-Laguë method and the LR-Hare method rank as the most proportional followed by LR-Droop; [[single transferable vote]]; modified Sainte-Laguë, d'Hondt and largest remainder Imperiali. While the allocation formula is important, equally important is the district magnitude (number of seats in a constituency). The higher the district magnitude, the more proportional a proportional electoral system becomes. |
||
==See also== |
|||
*[[List of democracy and elections-related topics]] |
|||
*[[List MP]] |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
Revision as of 23:23, 13 February 2005
Party-list proportional representation systems are a family of voting systems used in multiple-winner elections (e.g. elections to parliament), emphasizing proportional representation. In these systems, parties make lists of candidates to be elected, and seats get allocated to each party in proportion to the number of votes the party receives. Voters may vote directly for the party, like in Israel, or they may vote for candidates and that vote will pool to the party, like in Turkey and Finland. The order in which the party's list candidates get elected may be pre-determined by some method internal to the party (a closed list system) or they may be determined by the voters at large (an open list system).
There are many variations on seat allocation within party-list proportional representation. The three most common are:
- The d'Hondt method, used in Israel, Austria and Poland, among other places;
- The Sainte-Laguë method, used in many Scandinavian countries, New Zealand, and the German Federal State Bremen; and
- The largest remainder method.
List PR may also be combined in various hybrids (e.g. using the Additional member system).
The unmodified Sainte-Laguë method and the LR-Hare method rank as the most proportional followed by LR-Droop; single transferable vote; modified Sainte-Laguë, d'Hondt and largest remainder Imperiali. While the allocation formula is important, equally important is the district magnitude (number of seats in a constituency). The higher the district magnitude, the more proportional a proportional electoral system becomes.
External links
- Mike Ossipoff's site on List Proportional representation
- Site of the Independent Commission reviewing the effects of PR in the UK