Prefer Accept Reject voting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>Homunq |
imported>Homunq |
||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
|bgcolor="#fff"|0 |
|bgcolor="#fff"|0 |
||
|bgcolor="#fcc"|58 |
|bgcolor="#fcc"|58 |
||
|bgcolor="#fcc"| |
|bgcolor="#fcc"|42 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
!bgcolor="#fff"|Nashville |
!bgcolor="#fff"|Nashville |
||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
|bgcolor="#fff"|43 |
|bgcolor="#fff"|43 |
||
|bgcolor="#fff"|42 |
|bgcolor="#fff"|42 |
||
|bgcolor="#fcc"| |
|bgcolor="#fcc"|15 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
!bgcolor="#fff"|Knoxville |
!bgcolor="#fff"|Knoxville |
||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
|bgcolor="#fff"|41 |
|bgcolor="#fff"|41 |
||
|bgcolor="#fff"|42 |
|bgcolor="#fff"|42 |
||
|bgcolor="#fcc"| |
|bgcolor="#fcc"|17 |
||
|} |
|} |
||
</div> |
</div> |
||
Memphis is rejected by a majority, and is |
Memphis is rejected by a majority, and is nonviable. Chattanooga and Knoxville both get less than 25% preference, so they are also nonviable. Nashville is the leader, and wins with a tally of 100%. This is a strong equilibrium; no rational strategy from any faction or combination thereof would change the winner. Knoxville and/or Chattanooga could each prevent the other from being disqualified, but Nashville would still win with a tally of at least 68 (the ballots of Nashville and Memphis). |
||
(If Memphis voters rejected Nashville, then Chattanooga or Knoxville could win by conspiring to reject Nashville and accept Memphis. However, Nashville could stop this by rejecting them. Thus this strategy would not work without extreme foolishness from both Memphis and Nashville voters, ''and'' extreme amounts of strategy from the others.) |
(If Memphis voters rejected Nashville, then Chattanooga or Knoxville could win by conspiring to reject Nashville and accept Memphis. However, Nashville could stop this by rejecting them. Thus this strategy would not work without extreme foolishness from both Memphis and Nashville voters, ''and'' extreme amounts of strategy from the others.) |
||