Prefer Accept Reject voting: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
imported>Homunq
No edit summary
imported>Homunq
Line 45: Line 45:
* 40: C>B
* 40: C>B


None are majority-rejected, and C is the frontrunner. Points are: A, 60; B, 55; C, 55; X, 35. A wins. However, if 6 of the last group of voters strategically betrayed their true favorite C, the situation would be as follows:
None are majority-rejected, and C is the frontrunner. Points are: A, 60; B, 55; C, 55; X, 35. A wins. However, if 11 of the last group of voters strategically betrayed their true favorite C, the situation would be as follows:


* 30: AX>B (That is, on 35 ballots, A and X are preferred, B is accepted, and C is rejected)
* 30: AX>B (That is, on 35 ballots, A and X are preferred, B is accepted, and C is rejected)
Line 51: Line 51:
* 15: B>A
* 15: B>A
* 10: B>AC
* 10: B>AC
* 34: C>B
* 29: C>B
* 6: B
* 11: B


Now, C is not viable with 51% rejection; so B is the leader. Since C is no longer the leader, B gets the 34 points from C voters, and wins. The strategy succeeded; the strategic voters are better off.
Now, C is not viable with 51% rejection; so B is the leader. Since C is no longer the leader, B gets the 34 points from C voters, and wins. The strategy succeeded; the strategic voters are better off.